Rather that than What?
The worst 1 term President?
The only man to be tossed out of office over his birthplace?
The first President to be a lame duck during his first year in office?
Or just anything else that is possible?
Because clearly what he would rather be is impossible.
Want to Help Scott Brown? Click here
Seriously, if Obama is not actively trying to destroy this country he would have to be an imbecile. Since it seems unlikely he could be that stupid it is therefore impossible that he is not actively working to destroy the country.
So, what could he possibly be planning as his next step?
Tire worker unions refuse to admit that they had a hand in driving tire manufacturing off shore – appeal to Oblama and he raises taxes and tariffs in the middle of the economic mess he and his cronies created.
The unions have been working hard to drive jobs over seas for years. In 1974 the union drove Gates to abandon the tire business entirely. It was union demands that caused management to decide they could no longer devote resources and investment to the tire business – after 60 some years. They didn’t move the jobs elsewhere – they didn’t sell off their two tire factories in Denver – one brand new and state of the art. They shut it down. Very few of the tire workers transferred to belts or hoses – they were out of work – and the union’s demands caused it.
Like most other unionized industries – tires are less expensive to make where unions do not control things. Starting a trade war with anyone is a bad idea especially at this time. Obama obviously has no grasp of history, or world economies, or even common sense.
Ted Kennedy has died. He is to be buried in Arlington cemetary.
My mother (at whose house I labored all day today) taught me “to never speak ill of the dead” and “If you can’t say anything nice – don’t say anything at all!”
OK Mom.
Q: How many Obama voters does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: None. Hoping that it would change is quite enough.
Q: How many autoworkers does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: 17 at GM, Ford and Chrysler; 1 at Honda, Hyundai and Toyota.
Q: How many Illinois Dems does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: F— you, what am I gettin’ outta this?
Q: How many Democrats does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: It’s burnt out on the Republican side, so we’re not changing it.
Q: How many MSM journalists does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: No need, Obama is the Light.
Q: How many Congresspersons does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: None, but they’ll allocate a few hundred billion to achieve change under the Obama Stimulus Bill.
Q: How many environmentalist whackos does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: All of them, ignoring the mercury and pollution caused in China to make those CFLs.
Q: How many Daily Kos bloggers does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: It was Bush’s fault the bulb burned out; he’s gone – that is enlightening enough.
Q: How many Minnesota Canvassing Board members does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: Depends. They’ll only change it if it looks like a vote for Coleman.
Q: How many Oprah Winfrey fans does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: The bulb’s not so light these days.
Q: How many Cubans does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: There have been no lightbulbs since the USSR collapsed.
Q: How many North Koreans does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: What’s a lightbulb?
Q: How many Hollywood celebrities does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: Six to make movies about evil lightbulb companies, twelve to lecture about the unequal distribution of light on late night talk shows and nine to get caught with drugs hidden in cartons of lightbulbs.
Q: How many Obama appointees does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: His team is currently in the process of finding someone from the Clinton Administration who pid their taxes and knows how.
Q: How many President Obamas does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: The bulb is a lot more burnt out than we thought. Clearly, the bulb has deteriorated. It might not be changed as quickly as we would like and they now cost trillions.
The voters that have been hypnotized by Obama will never understand the term redistribution of wealth. Most of his most ardent supporters have no clue what Marxism or Communism are let alone what socialism is.
This morning on Fox news an Obama disciple actually contended that police departments and fire departments and schools represent current socialist institutions in this country. He is probably right about schools, at least in the case of most colleges – they are socialist indoctrination centers. But police departments as an example of socialism? He has no clue (or more likely is deliberately being obtuse) about what socialism is. He did not mention the largest current example of a socialist institution in the US – Social Security – probably because he does not want anyone to associate the Socialist programs Obama wishes to impose with the disastrous example that is Social Security.
Joe Biden was asked but did not answer whether he believed Share the Wealth was Marxist/Socialism. It is, but he could not admit it.
But none of it matters – the hypnotized Zombies that are the core Obama supporters are programmed not to even listen to anything critical and even if they listened they would not understand.
Our only hope is that there are enough people who have not yet come under his hypnosis and will make a reasonable rational choice next Tuesday.
The lawsuit about Obama’s status as a “natural born citizen” is sort of moot now that the Fed Judge has dismissed it. Of course the dismissal will do nothing to quiet those who are making the claim that Obama is not eligible. The reason for dismissal was given that Berg did not have standing to bring the case:
any harm from an allegedly ineligible candidate was “too vague and its effects too attenuated to confer standing on any and all voters.”
If every voter, if not every citizen of this country would not be individually effected by an ineligible candidate being elected then why would the Constitution demand that only those eligible be allowed to be president?
If not an individual voter then who should have standing?
How would the effects be attenuated?
This dismissal is actually more troubling than the possibility that Obama is ineligible!
Obama keeps saying he will reveal who he will name to his cabinet after the election. He is doing that because if he revealed them now it would give voters too much insight into his real agenda for “Change”.
Here is what I think his cabinet will be like. (You may need to Google some to understand why I picked them)
Homeland security – William Ayers
Treasury – Frank Raines
Fed Chairman – Sen. Dodd
Drug Czar – Gilberto Rodriguez
Agriculture – Ingrid Newkirk
(New Office) Gun Control Czar – Sarah Brady
Labor – Noam Chomsky
HHS – Cecile Richards
Energy – Algore
Commerce – Sam Webb
(New office) Election reform – Maude Hurd
Interior – Gloria Flora
Education – Bernadine Dohrn
Beyond the cabinet – Obama will act, as did FDR, to enlarge the supreme court to 13 or 15 justices so he can nullify the Conservatives on the court. First pick – Hillary.
As I think of more Dream Nightmare cabinet picks I’ll post them.
